Compare monthly prices for $50K evaluation accounts across top prop trading firms — find the cheapest way to get funded.
📅 Data verified: 2026-06-17
This comparison looks at the cheapest $50K prop firm accounts across 15 providers, including Uprofit, Leeloo Trading, Elite Trader Funding, Tradeify, Topstep, Funded Futures Network, Apex Trader Funding, and Bulenox. We compare upfront pricing, recurring fees, and key account rules because the lowest advertised price does not always mean the lowest real cost. For traders, understanding the full cost structure can make a major difference in choosing a firm that fits both budget and trading style.
| # | Firm | Monthly Price | Profit Split | Profit Target | Max Drawdown | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uprofit | $145/mo | 90% | $3,000 | $2,000 | Get Deal |
| 2 | Leeloo Trading | $150/mo | 90% | $3,500 | $2,000 | Get Deal |
| 3 | Elite Trader Funding | $150/mo | 100% | $3,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 4 | Tradeify | $155/mo | 90% | $3,000 | $2,000 | Get Deal |
| 5 | Topstep | $165/mo | 90% | $3,000 | $1,000 | Get Deal |
| 6 | Funded Futures Network | $165/mo | 90% | $3,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 7 | Apex Trader Funding | $167/mo | 100% | $3,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 8 | Bulenox | $169/mo | 90% | $4,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 9 | Earn2Trade | $170/mo | 80% | $3,000 | $2,000 | Get Deal |
| 10 | TradeDay | $170/mo | 90% | $3,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 11 | Funding Pips | $299/mo | 90% | $4,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 12 | True Forex Funds | $299/mo | 85% | $5,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 13 | The Funded Trader | $325/mo | 90% | $5,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 14 | FTMO | $345/mo | 90% | $5,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
| 15 | Crypto Fund Trader | $349/mo | 90% | $5,000 | $2,500 | Get Deal |
The cheapest $50K prop firm account is not always the best value, especially if strict drawdown rules, activation fees, or payout restrictions make the account harder to use profitably. Traders should focus on total cost and rule flexibility rather than headline price alone. A practical approach is to shortlist the lowest-cost firms, then choose the one with rules and payout terms that best match your strategy.
You should compare activation fees, reset fees, payout rules, trailing drawdown structure, profit targets, consistency rules, and whether the firm charges recurring platform or data fees. These extra costs and restrictions can have a bigger impact than the advertised monthly price.
Sometimes. Lower-cost accounts may come with tighter rules, less favorable drawdown policies, or stricter payout conditions. A cheap account can still be a good option, but traders should make sure the evaluation rules fit their strategy and risk management style.
They often differ in how they balance price with account rules, payout access, and evaluation difficulty. One firm may offer a lower entry cost, while another may provide more trader-friendly drawdown terms or simpler payout requirements. The best value depends on whether you prioritize low upfront cost, easier rules, or faster access to withdrawals.
Before buying the cheapest $50K challenge, verify the firm’s 2026 payout conditions, not just the entry fee. Several low-cost firms now advertise fast funding but quietly require 5–10 profitable days, block payouts after one oversized winning trade, or cap gains from news/EA strategies. A $20 cheaper account is not cheaper if it delays your first withdrawal by a month. Screenshot the payout FAQ and rule page on purchase day, because firms have been updating terms mid-quarter.